Skip to content

071 Operational Procedures topic guide

Windshear and Microburst

Windshear is simply a change in wind speed or direction over a short distance, and on its own it is a normal feature of the atmosphere that aircraft cope with constantly. The reason it earns a dedicated block of the syllabus is one specific source: the microburst, a small, intense downdraft that spreads out on hitting the ground and produces a wind change so sudden and so large that an aeroplane can run out of the energy needed to correct for it.

The danger sits in the sequence, not just the strength. An aeroplane flying through a microburst on approach first meets an increasing headwind, which briefly increases lift and airspeed and can tempt a pilot to reduce power. Moments later, in the same encounter, the wind reverses to a tailwind as the aeroplane crosses into the outflow, and both airspeed and lift fall away at the same time the aeroplane is already low, slow, and close to the ground.

Recognising an encounter

Cues that a windshear encounter is under way include airspeed fluctuations larger than normal turbulence would produce, an unexpected and sustained deviation from the intended glidepath or pitch attitude despite normal control inputs, and a rate of climb or descent that will not respond the way power and pitch changes normally command. Visual cues near thunderstorms, such as a rain shaft with a sharp-edged gust front, or dust being lifted in a ring pattern on the ground, are the outside-the-cockpit version of the same warning.

Two kinds of onboard system exist to catch this before it becomes a handling problem. A reactive system detects the windshear only once the aeroplane is already in it, comparing inertial and air-data measurements to sense the energy loss and issue a warning. A predictive system looks ahead of the aeroplane, typically using weather radar returns, and can warn of a windshear-producing cell before the aeroplane reaches it, buying time to avoid the encounter altogether rather than merely reacting to it.

The escape manoeuvre

Once a windshear warning fires, or the recognition cues make it clear an encounter is happening, the response is a fixed priority order rather than a judgement call. Thrust goes to maximum immediately, the pitch attitude is increased towards the margin defined by the stall warning system rather than towards a fixed pitch number, and the aircraft configuration, gear and flap, is frozen exactly as it is until the aeroplane is clear of the shear.

Where the aeroplane is fitted with flight director windshear guidance, that guidance is followed in preference to a manually flown pitch target, since it is computed from the aeroplane's actual energy state rather than a generic value. The manoeuvre prioritises staying away from the ground and away from the stall over holding an approach or a runway; if either margin is in doubt, a go-around, or a rejected take-off if still on the ground and within the accelerate-stop distance, is always the correct call rather than pressing on and hoping the shear passes.

  • Maximum thrust immediately
  • Pitch towards the stall warning margin, not a fixed pitch attitude
  • Configuration frozen: no gear or flap changes until clear
  • Follow flight director windshear guidance if fitted
  • Go around, or reject the take-off, whenever margins are in doubt

Worked example

Worked example: the escape manoeuvre sequence

During an approach, the crew receives a windshear warning at 300 ft. The aircraft is in landing configuration. What is the correct immediate response? Choose one answer.

Common mistakes

  • Reducing thrust when the initial headwind briefly increases airspeed

    That airspeed gain is transient and belongs to the entry phase of the encounter. Reducing power removes exactly the energy margin needed moments later when the tailwind phase reduces airspeed again.

  • Changing gear or flap configuration during the escape manoeuvre

    Reconfiguring mid-shear adds drag and control changes at the worst possible moment. The manoeuvre is flown in the existing configuration until clear.

  • Confusing predictive and reactive windshear systems

    A predictive system, generally radar-based, can warn before the encounter and allow avoidance, while a reactive system only confirms an encounter already under way. A question asking which system allows avoidance is testing this distinction specifically.

Related topic guides

Practise Operational Procedures the way the exam asks it.

SkyStudy turns Windshear and Microburst and every other Operational Procedures topic into exam-style practice questions with explanations, spaced repetition, and timed mock exams. Free to start.

Optional analytics measures site use and campaign visits, with Vercel, Plausible when configured, and Sentry browser error monitoring. Login and security remain available if you reject. Your choice is saved on this device for up to 180 days. Cookie policy.